July 2026
For Prospect & Counsel Review
AI Legal Intake —
Compliance Architecture Brief
How Presently is designed to meet TCPA, FCC, ABA, and state bar requirements for AI-assisted legal intake. Prepared for law firm management, general counsel, and compliance teams.
1. TCPA Compliance — Federal
The Rule
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. § 227) restricts the use of automated or artificial voice technology for outbound calls without prior express consent. The Fifth Circuit ruled February 25, 2026 (Bradford v. Sovereign Pest Control) that prior express consent — not written consent — is sufficient for artificial-voice calls.
Presently's Posture
2. FCC Regulations — Artificial Voice
The Rule
The FCC confirmed in 2024 that AI-generated voices constitute “artificial or prerecorded” voices under the TCPA. A proposed NPRM requiring in-call AI disclosure has not been finalized as of July 2026 under the current FCC administration.
Presently's Posture
3. ABA Ethics — Opinion 512 and AI Supervision
The Rule
ABA Formal Opinion 512 (July 2024) established the national baseline for attorney use of generative AI. It requires: (1) attorney competence in the AI tool used, (2) supervision of AI-generated output before reliance, (3) protection of client confidentiality, and (4) compliance with fee and candor obligations. As of March 2026, 35+ state bars have issued guidance building on Opinion 512.
Presently's Posture
4. State Bar Guidance — Priority States
| State | Key Guidance | Presently's Position |
|---|---|---|
| California | March 2026 proposed rule amendments require attorney supervision of AI tools | ✓ Attorney review before every consultation — compliant |
| Texas | No formal AI opinion as of July 2026; general competence and supervision rules apply | ✓ Platform design satisfies existing supervision standards |
| Florida | Opinion 24-1 requires lawyer oversight of AI intake tools and client consent to AI use | ✓ Attorney oversight built in; intake disclosure satisfies consent requirement |
| Illinois | No formal opinion; following ABA Opinion 512 baseline | ✓ Compliant under ABA baseline |
| New York | No formal opinion; following ABA Opinion 512 baseline | ✓ Compliant under ABA baseline |
| Alabama | July 2026 AI ethics guidance — attorney supervision and disclosure required | ✓ Compliant — proactive disclosure and attorney review both present |
| Colorado | Colorado AI Act designates legal services as high-risk AI domain; deployer liability rules apply | ✓ Law firm is the deployer/operator; Presently is the vendor tool |
5. Unauthorized Practice of Law
6. Data Privacy and Confidentiality
Presently processes caller information solely to deliver an intake summary to the supervising attorney. Data is not sold, shared with third parties, or used for marketing. All transmissions are encrypted in transit. Intake summaries are delivered exclusively to the attorney's designated email address.
7. Summary Compliance Matrix
| Requirement | Status | Architecture Feature |
|---|---|---|
| TCPA — inbound-only | ✓ Compliant | Platform answers calls; never initiates |
| FCC — AI disclosure | ✓ Ahead of requirement | System identifies as automated at call start |
| ABA Opinion 512 — supervision | ✓ Compliant | Attorney reviews every intake before action |
| State bar — attorney oversight | ✓ Compliant (all priority states) | Structured summary → attorney → consultation |
| UPL — no legal advice | ✓ Compliant | Intake collection only; no legal analysis |
| Data confidentiality | ✓ Compliant | Data flows only to supervising attorney |
Questions about compliance for your firm?
Book a free 30-minute call with Maiker. We'll walk through the architecture and answer your general counsel's questions directly.
Book a Compliance Call — 30 Min, FreeMaiker Kratc, Founder · founder@presently.legal · (832) 852-0019
This brief is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Law firms should consult qualified legal counsel regarding their specific compliance obligations. Regulatory landscape as of July 2026.